Maltitol
A sugar alcohol used to replace table sugar. It provides bulk and sweetness with fewer calories, helps hold moisture (humectant: an ingredient that attracts and retains water), and is less likely to cause tooth decay than sugar.
Should I eat Maltitol?
Maltitol is a highly refined, hydrogenated sweetener that can cut sugar and protect teeth, but your gut sets the limit. If a label shows a lot of polyols, keep servings modest—aim under about 20 g polyols at once—to avoid cramps or diarrhea.
Summary
Maltitol is a sugar alcohol made from corn or wheat starch by hydrogenation. It tastes close to sugar, provides bulk, and delivers about 2.4 kcal per gram with a smaller blood‑sugar rise than sugar. U.S. rules allow a “does not promote tooth decay” claim, and international reviews set an ADI “not specified,” while the EU continues to update evaluations. The main trade‑off is digestive tolerance: large servings or stacking several polyols can cause gas, bloating, and loose stools. If you have a sensitive gut (e.g., IBS) or you’re buying treats for kids, start low, check total polyols per serving, and space out portions.
Key Research Points
Overview
What is it?
Why is it used?
Origin
Maltitol is made by hydrogenating maltose, which itself is produced by breaking down starch from grains like corn or wheat. As catalytic hydrogenation and food-grade enzyme technology matured in the mid-20th century, maltitol became a popular sucrose replacer in European confectionery and later globally for sugar-free chocolates and candies.
Process: Liquefy & saccharify, then hydrogenate and crystallize
Steps
Chemicals
Research & Safety
Potential Concerns
The chief concern is digestive tolerance: large single servings or high daily totals of polyols can cause GI discomfort or diarrhea. Although its glycemic impact is lower than sugar, maltitol still contributes digestible carbohydrate and energy, so portion control matters, especially for people with diabetes. EU labels must warn that products with more than 10% added polyols may have laxative effects, underscoring this practical limit. EFSA’s ongoing re‑evaluation of sweeteners, including maltitols, reflects a desire for updated, harmonized evidence reviews rather than any specific hazard signal. ([eur-lex.europa.eu](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/432/2014-05-13/eng?utm_source=openai))
Potential Benefits
Maltitol helps cut sugars while preserving bulk and texture, which makes lower‑sugar candies, chocolate, baked goods, and frozen desserts more palatable. It provides about 2.1 kcal per gram in U.S. labeling—roughly half the calories of sugar—and generally causes a smaller rise in blood glucose and insulin than sucrose. It is also noncariogenic and can support U.S. dental‑health and EU tooth‑mineralisation claims when products meet test conditions. These properties explain its common use in “sugar‑free” or “no added sugar” confectionery. ([law.cornell.edu](https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/101.9?utm_source=openai))
Digestive Effects
Tolerance varies by person and context (food matrix, whether other polyols are present). Reviews and product‑development guidance suggest keeping total polyols near or below 20 g per serving to minimize symptoms. In a controlled crossover study, healthy adults showed dose‑dependent symptoms, with diarrhea occurring only at unusually high day‑long intakes (~90 g). EU risk‑management notes also indicate that, in solid foods, polyols are unlikely to cause laxation below about 20 g/day from all sources. Children and people with IBS generally report symptoms at lower intakes. ([pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400077/))
Limit Consumption
People with IBS or sensitive GI tracts are more likely to experience symptoms from polyols, and combining different polyols can lower tolerance thresholds. Children may also be more sensitive to osmotic effects, so smaller portions are prudent. Individuals with diabetes should remember that maltitol still adds carbohydrate and calories, even though its glycemic impact is lower than sugar. There are no common allergy concerns; regulatory reviews have not identified systemic toxicity at typical dietary exposures. ([pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28710145/?utm_source=openai))
Fact Sheet
Regulatory Status
ESG & Sustainability
Allergens and Diet
Natural Alternatives
Honey
Dates
Inulin
Citations
Maltitol – specification and ADI ‘not specified’
1996-01-01JECFA • JECFA
Maltitol (chemID 4276) – ADI not specified
1996-01-01WHO/JECFA • WHO/JECFA database
Re-evaluation of sweeteners – includes E965 Maltitols
2024-03-01EFSA • EFSA Journal / State-of-play slide
Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1175 (polyols, labeling >10%)
2021-07-16European Commission • EU Law
21 CFR §101.80 – Noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners
2024-01-01FDA • ECFR
Health potential of polyols as sugar replacers
2003-06-01G. Livesey • Nutrition Research Reviews
Systematic Review of the Effects of Polyols on Gastrointestinal Health
2017-01-01A. Lenhart et al. • Advances in Nutrition
Sweeteners permitted in the EU: Safety aspects
2006-01-01A. Mortensen • Food & Nutrition Research
Maltitol: Analytical Determination, Applications in the Food Industry
2020-07-15A. Saraiva et al. • NIH/PMC
A digestive tolerance study of maltitol
2003-01-01A. Ruskoné-Fourmestraux et al. • PubMed